In their November 2011 issue, Sprinkler Age magazine featured its Annual Legislative Review for the United States and Canada. This summary of legislation and codes offers an overview of regulations affecting the fire sprinkler industry in individual states. The information was obtained from a survey mailed to the fire marshals of the 50 states. Listed below are the responses and findings for California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas. A dash (-) means there was no response.
State | Requires | Requires for Sprinkler Drawings: | |||
Plan | Inspectors | PE / | NICET Level | NICET Level | |
| California | Y/N | Y/N | Y | N | N |
| Colorado | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Connecticut | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y per IBC |
| Florida | Y | Y | Y | Y | N |
| Georgia | Y | Y | GA Cert of Completion | ||
| Illinois | N | N | Design | Layout | – |
| Massachusetts | N | N | Y | Some exceptions | |
| Michigan | Y, bldg. insp. & plan rev. | – | – | – | |
| Missouri | N | N | Y | N | N |
| New Jersey | Cert. | Y | Y | – | – |
| New York | N | Y | Y | N | N |
| North Carolina | Y | Y | – | Y | – |
| Ohio | Y | Y | Y | N | N |
| Pennsylvania | Y | Y | N | N | N |
| Texas | Y | Y | – | Y | N |
Inspection, Testing & Maintenance and Seismic Protection Requirements | ||||
State | Required for those who perform inspection, testing and maintenance of water-based fire protection systems: | Seismic protection required on fire sprinkler systems: | ||
NICET | NICET | No | ||
| California | N | N | – | Y |
| Colorado | N | N | – | N |
| Connecticut | N | N | No req. | Y per code req. |
| Florida | Y | N | – | N |
| Georgia | Y | Y | – | N |
| Illinois | Y | – | – | Y, Per NFPA 13 |
| Massachusetts | – | – | No req. | Y, some exceptions |
| Michigan | – | – | – | Y |
| Missouri | N | N | – | N |
| New Jersey | Y | N | N | Y |
| New York | N | N | – | N |
| North Carolina | Y | Y | – | Y |
| Ohio | N | N | – | N |
| Pennsylvania | – | – | No req. | Y |
| Texas | Y | N | – | N |
State | Code Adoption | NFPA 13 Edition Adopted | Adopted NFPA 25 | Requires PE to do Sprinkler Design Concepts | |
Statewide | Locally | ||||
| California | 2009 IBC & IFC, both amended | 2010 | 2002 NFPA, 2006 CA ed. | – | No |
| Colorado | 2006 IBC, IFC, NFPA1, NFPA5000, 2002-03 NFPA20, 22, 24, 72 | 2002 | Yes, 2002 Ed. | – | No, also accept NICET III/IV |
| Connecticut | 2003 NFPA1, 101, IBC & IFC – all amended | 2007 | Yes | – | Yes or NICET |
| Florida | 2006 2006 NFPA1, amended | 2002 | Yes | – | Yes |
| Georgia | 2006 IBC & IFC, 2000 NFPA101 – all amended | 2002 | 2002 Ed. | – | No |
| Illinois | 2001 NFPA101 amended; 2005 ICC; 2006 IBC amended not statewide, only appl. if a local juris. did not adopt bldg. code of its own | 1999 | Yes, 1998 Ed. as ref. by NFPA101 | – | Yes |
| Massachusetts | 2009 IBC amended; portions of 2009 IFC | 2007 | No | – | No |
| Michigan | 2008 IBC, 1997/2006 NFPA101 and 1997 NFPA1, all amended | Varies depending on references | – | Yes, varies | No |
| Missouri | N/A | 1999 | 1998 | – | – |
| New Jersey | 1996 BOCA amended maintenance, fire prevention; 2000 IBC & IFC amended – new constr. | 1999 for new installs | Yes | – | Yes or Architect |
| New York | 2003 IBC & IFC, both amended | 2002 | Yes, 1998 | – | – |
| North Carolina | 2006 IBC & IFC, both amended | 2002 | Yes, 2002 Ed. | – | No |
| Ohio | 2006 IBC & IFC, amended | 2002 | 2002 Ed. | Yes | Yes |
| Pennsylvania | 2009 IBC & IFC | 2007 | No | No | No |
| Texas | 2003 IBC & IRC in cities; 2006 NFPA101 in counties | 2002 for contractors | 1998 Ed. for Contractors | Varies | No |
Risk Logic, Inc. can be of assistance regarding fire protection Codes and Regulations. We can ensure that the above codes, as well as NFPA and FM Global standards, are being followed to avoid a major property loss.